UPDATING SOCIOCULTURAL ASPECT OF CONTENT OF HIGHER EDUCATION
Abstract
Introduction. The article analyzes sociocultural conditionality of education content, considers the necessity of its enrichment with humanistic sociocultural values demanded in professional activity of a graduate in multicultural changing world.
The purpose of the article is to conceptualize the world-view essence of the sociocultural discourse and its defining role in updating content of education as the necessary condition for bringing up a competent specialist.
Objectives of the article are to analyse the problem of updating education content in the context of modern concepts of humanization; determine the essence and structure of the sociocultural aspect of professional training at a modern university; presentation of the conditions for updating the sociocultural aspect of the content of education in the activities of a university teacher.
Methodology. In order to achieve the goal, we studied the concept of humanization of education with methodological instruments of social philosophy, anthropology, cultural studies, considering the increasing role of the value aspect in the content of education.
Results. The scientific novelty of the article is in determining vector for updating the content of education and showing relevance of its sociocultural aspect for the first time in the context of interrelationship of global humanism, universal evolutionism and post-nonclassical rationality. The article reveals the worldview essence of the sociocultural aspect of the content of education and proves the importance to update it for both humanities and natural sciences. We also propose the structure of the sociocultural aspect and possible ways to renew it in the context of cultural science. Of practical importance are the conditions outlined in the study for updating the content of education, a special place among which belongs to the teacher’s ability to reflect on its hidden component as a significant channel for transmitting sociocultural humanistic values. Conclusion. Education that meets sociocultural challenges of changing world by updating its content serves as an indicator of the quality of professional training at universities, ensures bringing up socioculturally competent specialists capable of resolving contradictions in the modern world and ready to maintain its sustainable development.
Downloads
References
Cписок литературы
Адамский А.И., Асмолов А.Г., Архангельский А.Н. Зицер Д., Ковалева Т., Лукша П. О., Собкин В. С., Фрумин И. Д., Хилтунен Е., Реморенко И. М., Волков С., Ушакова Е., Шперх А., Эпштейн М. Манифест «Гуманистическая педагогика: ХХI век // Вестник образования. 2015. № 10. С. 1-17.
Бенин В.Л. Гуманистическая педагогика и тренды современного российского социума // Сибирский педагогический журнал. 2017. № 4. С. 131-136.
Вербицкий А.А. Новые грани вечной проблемы. Об образовании в контексте и вне его // Высшее образование сегодня. 2017. № 8. С. 6-13.
Зеер Э.Ф. Личностно-развивающее профессиональное образование: монография. Екатеринбург: Издательство РГППУ, 2006. 169 с.
Касаткин П.И., Силантьева М.В. Антропологический аспект глобальных моделей образования: поиски и решения // Полис. Политические исследования. 2017. № 6. С. 137-149. https://doi.org/10.17976/jpps/2017.06.10
Краевский В.В. Науки об образовании и наука об образовании (методологические проблемы современной педагогики) // Вопросы философии. 2009. № 3. С. 77-82.
Моисеев Н.Н. Восхождение к разуму. Лекции по универсальному эволюционизму и его приложениям. М.: ИздАТ, 1993. 174 с.
Степин В.С. Типы научной рациональности и синергетическая парадигма // Сложность. Разум. Постнеклассика. 2013. № 4. С. 45-59.
Шишлова Е.Э. Обновление содержания высшего образования в контексте современных социокультурных трендов // Высшее образование в России. 2021. Т. 30. № 6. С. 70-79. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-70-79
Шишлова Е.Э., Курицын И.А. Скрытое содержание профессионального языкового образования в социокультурном измерении // Интеграция образования. 2017. Т. 21. № 4. С. 709–722. https://doi.org/10.15507/1991-9468.089.021.201704.709-722
Шишлова Е.Э. Социокультурная компетентность как показатель качества профессиональной подготовки специалиста // Высшее образование в России. 2020. Т. 29. № 5. С. 95-102. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-5-95-102
Anužienė I. The structure of socio-cultural competence (self) development. Profesinis rengimas: tyrimai ir realijos, 2015, no. 26, pp. 94-105. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=526889 (accessed May 10, 2023).
Curry L.,Wergin John F. Educating Professionals: Responding to New Expectations for Competence and Accountability. Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, 1993. 379 p.
Ibrahim F.A., Heuer J.R. Cultural and Social Justice Counseling. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016. 256 р.
Liendo, P. J. A pragmatic approach to teaching intercultural competence to trainee teachers and translators. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 2012, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 57-72.
Sewell Jr., William H. The logic of history. Social theory and social transformation. University of Chicago «University Of Chicago Press», Chicago, 2005. 376 р.
References
Adamskiy A. I., Asmolov A. G., Arkhangel’skiy A. N., Zitser D., Kovaleva T., Luksha P. O., Sobkin V. S., Frumin I. D., Khiltunen E., Remorenko I. M., Volkov S., Ushakova E., Shperkh A., Epshteyn M. Bulletin of Education, 2015, no. 10, pp. 1-17.
Benin V.L. Siberian Pedagogical Journal, 2017, no. 4, pp. 131-136.
Verbitskiy A.A. Higher education today, 2017, no. 8, pp. 6-13.
Zeer E.F. Lichnostno-razvivayushchee professional’noe obrazovanie: monografiya [Personally developing professional education: a monograph]. Yekaterinburg: Publishing House of the Russian State Pedagogical University, 169 p.
Kasatkin P.I., Silant’eva M.V. Polis. Political Studies, 2017, no. 6, pp. 137-149.
Kraevskiy V.V. Problems of Philosophy, 2009, no. 3, pp. 77-82.
Moiseev N.N. Voskhozhdenie k razumu. Lektsii po universal’nomu evolyutsionizmu i ego prilozheniyam [Ascent to the Mind. Lectures on universal evolutionism and its applications]. Moscow: Publishing House, 1993, 174 р.
Stepin V.S. Complexity. Mind. Postclassical, 2013, no. 4, pp. 45-59.
Shishlova E.E. Higher Education in Russia, 2021, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 70-79, https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2021-30-6-70-79
Shishlova E.E., Kuritsyn I.A. Integration of Education, 2017, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 709–722.
Shishlova E.E. Higher Education in Russia, 2020 vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 95-102. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2020-29-5-95-102
Anužienė I. The structure of socio-cultural competence (self) development. Profesinis rengimas: tyrimai ir realijos, 2015, no. 26, pp. 94-105. https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=526889 (accessed May 10, 2023).
Curry L., Wergin John F. Educating Professionals: Responding to New Expectations for Competence and Accountability. Jossey- Bass, San Francisco, 1993, 379 p.
Ibrahim F.A., Heuer J.R. Cultural and Social Justice Counseling. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 2016, 256 р.
Liendo, P. J. A pragmatic approach to teaching intercultural competence to trainee teachers and translators. Latin American Journal of Content and Language Integrated Learning, 2012, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 57-72.
Sewell Jr., William H. The logic of history. Social theory and social transformation. University of Chicago «University Of Chicago Press», Chicago, 2005, 376 р.
Abstract views: 145
Copyright (c) 2023 Ekaterina E. Shishlova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
