PROSOCIAL MEDIA RESOURCE: PROJECT-EDUCATIONAL INTENSIVE OF STUDENTS
Abstract
Relevance. The relevance of the topic comes from its various aspects and manifestations of behavior aimed at helping other people and society, including using the digital environment. The article discusses the technology of students’ project activities for the creation of prosocial media. The experience of prosocial design on the platform of the University 20.35 is presented.
The purpose of the study. Based on the study of the attitude of young people to media resources promoting assistance to other people and society, to develop and implement educational intensive technology to create by students prosocial media.
Methods and methodology. The methodological basis of the study was the approaches of media education. Methods: data selection and systematization, document analysis, Internet media monitoring, quantitative analysis of publications in youth Internet media, design. Empirical data are comprehended and processed using content analysis, quantitative analysis methods (descriptive statistics, percentage analysis. The calculations were made on the basis of the SPPS 22 statistical software package.
Results. The preferences of young people in the choice of forms of presentation of prosocial topics in the media space are revealed, their reactions to prosocial posts, blogs, videos, publications are studied, the structure of the projected prosocial media environment is determined. An educational intensive technology has been implemented to create a test prototype for the prosocial media “Let’s make the world a better place!”.
Conclusion. Based on the results of the study of the attitude of young people to prosocial media, a technology for teaching the design of prosocial media was developed and implemented, which allowed students to form attitudes to prosocial activity.
The scope of the results. The results of the study should be taken into account when developing programs and projects aimed at ensuring the digital socialization of young people.
Downloads
References
Список литературы
Кисляков П. А. Методические аспекты использования информационно-коммуникационных технологий в подготовке будущих педагогов в области социальной безопасности // Педагогическое образование в России. 2013. № 1. С. 24-29.
Кисляков П. А., Шмелева Е.А. Психология безопасного просоциального поведения личности. М. ООО «Когито-Центр», 2021. 357 с.
Ланцова С. В., Шмелева Е.А., Кисляков П.А. Просоциальный потенциал онлайн игр для подростков // Цифровизация в условиях пандемии: миссия социального университета будущего: сборник материалов XXI международного социального конгресса. М., 2022. С. 186-189.
Ланцова С.В., Шмелева Е.А., Кисляков П.А. Потенциал медиаресурсов в воспитании просоциального поведения в молодежной среде // Наука и образование в современном вузе: вектор развития: Материалы научно-практической конференции. Шуя, 2021. С.110-113.
Медиаресурсы как средство формирования просоциальной активности современной молодежи / Н. Ю. Прияткина, В. К. Маркелов, Ю. И. Савельева [и др.] // Современные тренды образования: материалы IV Всероссийской (национальной) педагогической научно-практической конференции. Шуя, 2022. С. 141-145.
Серова Е.А. Формирование просоциального поведения молодежи как одна из задач публичной политики // Вестник социально-политических наук. 2014. №13. С. 44-47
Шмелева Е. А., Кисляков П. А., Ланцова С. В. Просоциальность молодежи: возможности медиа // Человеческий фактор: Социальный психолог. 2022. № 1(43). С. 192-199.
Шмелева Е.А., Кисляков П.А., Ланцова С.В., Меерсон А.Л.С. Медиаресуры как сфера просоциального взаимодействия молодежи в цифровой среде // Цифровая гуманитаристика и технологии в образовании (DHTE 2021): Сборник статей II Всероссийской научно-практической конференции с международным участием. М., 2021. С.546-556.
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In: Handbook of moral behavior and development. Ed. by W. M. Kurtines, J. L. Gewirtz. 1991. Vol. 1. pp. 45-103
Barlett C.P., Anderson C.A. Examining media effects: The General Aggression and General Learning Models. In E. Scharrer (Ed.), Media effects/media psychology. Boston, MA: Blackwell-Wiley. 2013. pp. 1-20.
Coyne S.M., Padilla-Walker L.M., Holmgren H.G., Davis E.J., Collier K.M., Memmott-Elison M.K., Hawkins, A.J. A meta-analysis of prosocial media on prosocial behavior, aggression, and empathic concern: A multidimensional approach // Developmental Psychology. 2018. Vol. 54(2). P. 331-347
De Leeuw R.N.H., Kleemans M., Rozendaal E., Anschütz D.J., Buijzen M. The impact of prosocial television news on children’s prosocial behavior: An experimental study in the Netherlands // Journal of Children and Media. 2015. Vol. 9(4). P. 419-434
Gentile D.A., Anderson C.A., Yukawa N., Saleem M., Lim K.M., Shibuya A., Sakamoto A. The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2009. Vol. 35. P. 752-763
Greitemeyer T. Effects of Prosocial Media on Social Behavior When and Why Does Media Exposure Affect Helping and Aggression? // Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011. Vol. 20(4). P. 251-255. DOI: 10.1177/0963721411415229
Greitemeyer T., Osswald S., Brauer M. Playing prosocial video games increases empathy and decreases schadenfreude // Emotion. 2010. Vol. 10. P. 796-802
Gyldensted C. From mirrors to movers: Five elements of positive psychology in constructive journalism. Loveland. CO: Group Publishers, 2015
Hogan M.J., Strasburger V.C. Media and Prosocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents. Handbook of Moral and Character Education. Educational Psychology Handbook. Ed. by Nucci LP; Narvaez D. 2008. P. 537-553
Kislyakov P.A., Shmeleva E.A. Analysis of Russians’ views on personal qualities as a basis for prosocial safe behavior factors’ identification // Open Psychology Journal. 2020. Vol. 13(1). P. 40-48.
Kislyakov P., Shmeleva E., Silaeva O. The possibility of prosocial media in the digital socialization of children // Child in the Digital World: The International Psychological Forum: Book of Abstracts. M., 2021. P. 63. DOI 10.26226/morressier.6082ba61dc2fa1af56246f31.
Kleemans M., Schlindwein L.F., Dohmen R. Preadolescents’ Emotional and Prosocial Responses to Negative TV News: Investigating the Beneficial Effects of Constructive Reporting and Peer Discussion // J Youth Adolescence. 2017. Vol. 46. P. 2060-2072
Mares M. L., Stephenson L.J. Prosocial Media Use and Effects. In book: The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. 2017. DOI: 10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0153
Mares M.L., Woodard E. Positive effects of television on children’s social interactions: A meta-analysis // Media Psychology. 2005. Vol. 7.
P. 301-322.
McIntyre K. E. Constructive journalism: The effects of positive emotions and solution information in news stories (Doctoral dissertation). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2015
Obar J.A., Wildman S. Social media definition and the governance challenge: an introduction to the special issue // Telecommun. Policy. 2015. Vol. 39. P. 745-750.
Prot S., et al Long-term relations among prosocial-media use, empathy, and prosocial behavior // Psychol Sci. 2014. Vol. 25(2). P. 358-368
Rosenkoetter L.I. The television situation comedy and children’s prosocial behavior // Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 1999. Vol. 29. P. 979-993.
Saleem M., Anderson C.A., Gentile D.A. Effects of prosocial, neutral, and violent video games on children’s helpful and hurtful behaviors // Aggressive Behavior. 2012. Vol. 38. P. 281-287
Tsvetkova M., Macy M. The Contagion of Prosocial Behavior and the Emergence of Voluntary-Contribution Communities. In: Gonçalves B., Perra N. (eds) Social Phenomena. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham. 2015. pp. 117-134.
References
Kislyakov P. A. Pedagogicheskoe obrazovanie v Rossii [Pedagogical education in Russia]. 2013, No. 1, pp. 24-29.
Kislyakov P. A., Shmeleva E.A. Psihologiya bezopasnogo prosocial’nogo povedeniya lichnosti [Psychology of safe prosocial behavior of the individual]. M., 2021, 357 p.
Lancova S. V., Shmeleva E.A., Kislyakov P.A. Sbornik materialov XXIi mezhdunarodnogo social’nogo kongressa “Cifrovizaciya v usloviyah pandemii: missiya social’nogo universiteta budushchego” [Digitalization in a pandemic: mission of the social university of the future : collection of materials of the xxi International Social Congress]. M., 2022, pp. 186-189.
Lancova S.V., Shmeleva E.A., Kislyakov P.A. Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Nauka i obrazovanie v sovremennom vuze: vektor razvitiya” [Science and education in a modern university: vector of development: Materials of a scientific and practical conference]. Shuya, 2021, pp.110-113.
Priyatkina N. Yu., Markelov V. K., Savel’eva Yu. L. [i dr.] Materialy IV Vserossijskoj (nacional’noj) pedagogicheskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii “Sovremennye trendy obrazovaniya” [Modern trends in education: materials of the IV All-Russian (national) Pedagogical scientific and practical conference. Shuya, 2022, pp. 141-145.
Serova E.A. Vestnik social’no-politicheskih nauk [Bulletin of Socio-Political Sciences]. 2014, no.13, pp. 44-47
Shmeleva E. A., Kislyakov P. A., Lancova S. V. Chelovecheskij faktor: Social’nyj psiholog [Human factor: Social psychologist]. 2022, no. 1(43), pp. 192-199.
Shmeleva E.A., Kislyakov P.A., Lancova S.V., Meerson A.L.S. Sbornik statej II Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem “Cifrovaya gumanitaristika i tekhnologii v obrazovanii (DHTE 2021)” [Digital humanities and technologies in education (DHTE 2021): Collection of articles of the II All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with international participation]. M., 2021, pp.546-556.
Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of moral thought and action. In: Handbook of moral behavior and development. Ed. by W. M. Kurtines, J. L. Gewirtz, 1991, vol. 1, pp. 45-103
Barlett C.P., Anderson C.A. Examining media effects: The General Aggression and General Learning Models. In E. Scharrer (Ed.), Media effects/media psychology. Boston, MA: Blackwell-Wiley, 2013, pp. 1-20.
Coyne S.M., Padilla-Walker L.M., Holmgren H.G., Davis E.J., Collier K.M., Memmott-Elison M.K., Hawkins, A.J. A meta-analysis of prosocial media on prosocial behavior, aggression, and empathic concern: A multidimensional approach. Developmental Psychology, 2018, vol. 54(2), pp. 331-347
De Leeuw R.N.H., Kleemans M., Rozendaal E., Anschütz D.J., Buijzen M. The impact of prosocial television news on children’s prosocial behavior: An experimental study in the Netherlands. Journal of Children and Media, 2015, vol. 9(4), pp. 419-434.
Gentile D.A., Anderson C.A., Yukawa N., Saleem M., Lim K.M., Shibuya A., Sakamoto A. The effects of prosocial video games on prosocial behaviors: International evidence from correlational, longitudinal, and experimental studies. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2009, vol. 35, pp. 752-763.
Greitemeyer T. Effects of Prosocial Media on Social Behavior When and Why Does Media Exposure Affect Helping and Aggression? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2011, vol. 20(4), pp. 251-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415229
Greitemeyer T., Osswald S., Brauer M. Playing prosocial video games increases empathy and decreases schadenfreude. Emotion, 2010, vol. 10, pp. 796-802.
Gyldensted C. From mirrors to movers: Five elements of positive psychology in constructive journalism. Loveland. CO: Group Publishers, 2015.
Hogan M.J., Strasburger V.C. Media and Prosocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents. Handbook of Moral and Character Education. Educational Psychology Handbook. Ed. by Nucci LP; Narvaez D. 2008, pp. 537-553.
Kislyakov P.A., Shmeleva E.A. Analysis of Russians’ views on personal qualities as a basis for prosocial safe behavior factors’ identification. Open Psychology Journal, 2020, vol. 13(1), pp. 40-48.
Kislyakov P., Shmeleva E., Silaeva O. The possibility of prosocial media in the digital socialization of children. Child in the Digital World: The International Psychological Forum: Book of Abstracts. M., 2021, pp. 63. https://doi.org/10.26226/morressier.6082ba61dc2fa1af56246f31.
Kleemans M., Schlindwein L.F., Dohmen R. Preadolescents’ Emotional and Prosocial Responses to Negative TV News: Investigating the Beneficial Effects of Constructive Reporting and Peer Discussion. J Youth Adolescence, 2017, vol. 46, pp. 2060-2072.
Mares M. L., Stephenson L.J. Prosocial Media Use and Effects. In book: The International Encyclopedia of Media Effects. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118783764.wbieme0153
Mares M.L., Woodard E. Positive effects of television on children’s social interactions: A meta-analysis. Media Psychology, 2005, vol. 7, pp. 301-322.
McIntyre K. E. Constructive journalism: The effects of positive emotions and solution information in news stories (Doctoral dissertation). Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. 2015.
Obar J.A., Wildman S. Social media definition and the governance challenge: an introduction to the special issue. Telecommun. Policy, 2015, vol. 39, pp. 745-750.
Prot S., et al Long-term relations among prosocial-media use, empathy, and prosocial behavior. Psychol Sci, 2014, vol. 25(2), pp. 358-368.
Rosenkoetter L.I. The television situation comedy and children’s prosocial behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1999, vol. 29, pp. 979-993.
Saleem M., Anderson C.A., Gentile D.A. Effects of prosocial, neutral, and violent video games on children’s helpful and hurtful behaviors. Aggressive Behavior, 2012, vol. 38, pp. 281-287.
Tsvetkova M., Macy M. The Contagion of Prosocial Behavior and the Emergence of Voluntary-Contribution Communities. In: Gonçalves B., Perra N. (eds) Social Phenomena. Computational Social Sciences. Springer, Cham, 2015, pp. 117-134.
Abstract views: 299
Copyright (c) 2022 Elena A. Shmeleva, Pavel A. Kislyakov, Natalya Yu. Priyatkina, Ayzek-Leyb S. Meerson, Stanislav V. Belov, Valery K. Markelov, Ekaterina A. Ananyeva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
