<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Education and Psychology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Education and Psychology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Education and Psychology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2658-4034</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2782-3563</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Science and Innovation Center Publishing House</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">438046</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12731/2658-4034-2026-17-2-937</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">ZCXXZN</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Фундаментальные основы и междисциплинарные связи</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Fundamental Principles and Interdisciplinary Connections</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Foreign contemporary psychological studies of the personality social worldview</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Зарубежные современные психологические исследования социального мировоззрения личности</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0007-7148-4777</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="scopus">35222205000</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="researcherid">GLT-6830-2022</contrib-id><contrib-id contrib-id-type="spin">5204-1205</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nekhorosheva</surname><given-names>Inna V.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Нехорошева</surname><given-names>Инна Владимировна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Россия</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>кандидат психологических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры социальной и педагогической психологии</p> <p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>PhD in Psychology, Senior Lecturer of Department of Social and Educational Psychology</p> <p> </p></bio><email>i-vl-n@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Государственный университет просвещения</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="en">State University of Education</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><content-language>ru</content-language><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>55</fpage><lpage>77</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-07-17"><day>17</day><month>07</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; , Nekhorosheva I.V.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; , Нехорошева И.В.</copyright-statement><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Nekhorosheva I.V.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Нехорошева И.В.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-4034/article/view/438046">https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-4034/article/view/438046</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Background</bold>. A person's worldview, as a system of fundamental beliefs, has a comprehensive impact on their perception of the world and new information, their assessment of the behavior of others, and their opinions on many socially important issues. International research on worldviews is much broader than domestic research, so its analysis and critical understanding can be useful for developing domestic concepts and methods.</p> <p><bold>Purpose</bold> – to analyze contemporary international psychological research on worldviews and to identify and describe the most important areas.</p> <p><bold>Materials and methods</bold>. The Scilit.com database was searched for english-language psychological research articles on worldviews published between 2016 and 2025. The articles were then systematized by topic, and the largest area was identified and described.</p> <p><bold>Results</bold>. Three major thematic areas were identified: social worldview, ecological worldview, and religious worldview, including the topic of death. The most extensive area is "social worldview"; it includes beliefs about the structure of society and social relations, ideological and socio-political beliefs of respondents. The most influential areas are highlighted (with an indication of the approximate number of scientific articles over the past 10 years). 1. Fundamental ideological beliefs: Right-Wing Authoritarianism (330) and Social Dominance Orientation (700). 2. Basic beliefs about the social world: Dangerous World Belief (140), Competitive-jungle World Belief (150), Zero-Sum Belief – belief that social world is a zero-sum game (90). 3. Four types of worldviews according to cultural theory: individualism, hierarchism, egalitarianism, fatalism (200). For each area, theoretical propositions, diagnostic methods, and the results of recent empirical research are briefly reviewed.</p> <p><bold>Conclusions</bold>. In international psychology, the topic of worldview is viewed as belonging to psychology, not just philosophy and other social sciences. According to the presented empirical data, people's beliefs regarding the structure of society are linked to their beliefs regarding other sociopolitical and environmental issues. It is emphasized that the patterns confirmed in samples from Western societies are not always confirmed in samples from Eastern societies due to differences in mentalities, the relevance of diagnostic methods issues, and the level of sociopolitical disagreements within society. Consequently, not all the presented theories and empirical patterns can be confirmed in Russian samples. Therefore, they can be considered as ideas for developing a domestic psychology of worldviews, incorporating issues important to Russian society.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование</bold>. Мировоззрение личности, как система фундаментальных убеждений, оказывает всестороннее влияние на восприятие мира и новой информации, на оценку поведения других людей, на формирование мнения по многим социально важным вопросам. Зарубежная область изучения мировоззрения людей гораздо обширнее отечественной, ее анализ и критическое осмысление может быть полезно для разработки отечественных концепций и методик.</p> <p><bold>Цель </bold>– проанализировать современные зарубежные психологические исследования мировоззрения, выделить и описать наиболее крупные области.</p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы</bold>. В базе данных Scilit.com проводился поиск англоязычных психологических научных статей по теме мировоззрения, опубликованных с 2016 по 2025 год. Далее проводилась систематизация по тематике, выделение наиболее крупной области и ее описание.</p> <p><bold>Результаты</bold>. Выделены 3 крупные тематические области: социальное мировоззрение, экологическое мировоззрение, религиозное мировоззрение, в том числе тема смерти. Рассмотрена наиболее обширная область – «социальное мировоззрение», включающая убеждения об устройстве общества и общественных отношений, идеологические и социально-политические убеждения респондентов. Выделены наиболее влиятельные направления (с указанием приблизительного количества научных статей за последние 10 лет). 1. Фундаментальные идеологические убеждения: правый авторитаризм Right-Wing Authoritarianism (330) и ориентация на социальное доминирование Social Dominance Orientation (700). 2. Базовые убеждения о социальном мире. Убеждение в том, что социальный мир опасен, Dangerous World Belief (140). Убеждение в том, что социальный мир – это конкурентные джунгли, Competitive-jungle World Belief (150). Убеждение в том, что социальный мир – это игра с нулевой суммой, Zero-Sum Belief (90). 3. Четыре типа мировоззрений по теории культуры: индивидуализм, иерархизм, эгалитаризм, фатализм (200). По каждому направлению кратко рассмотрены теоретические положения, методики психодиагностики и результаты последних эмпирических исследований.</p> <p><bold>Выводы</bold>. В зарубежной психологии тема мировоззрения рассматривается как принадлежащая психологии, а не только философии и другим социальным наукам. Согласно приведенным эмпирическим данным, убеждения человека по вопросам устройства общества связаны с его убеждениями по другим социально-политическим и экологическим вопросам. При этом подчеркивается, что закономерности, подтвержденные на выборках из западных обществ, далеко не всегда подтверждаются на выборках из восточных обществ из-за разницы менталитетов, актуальности вопросов методик, уровня социально-политических разногласий внутри общества. Следовательно, не все представленные теории и эмпирические закономерности могут подтвердиться на российских выборках. Поэтому их можно рассматривать как идеи для разработки отечественной психологии мировоззрения, затрагивающей вопросы, важные для российского общества.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>мировоззрение</kwd><kwd>культурная теория М. Дуглас</kwd><kwd>эгалитаризм</kwd><kwd>правый авторитаризм</kwd><kwd>ориентация на социальное доминирование</kwd><kwd>вера в опасный мир</kwd><kwd>вера в конкурентный мир</kwd><kwd>вера с мир с нулевой суммой</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>worldview</kwd><kwd>cultural theory M. Douglas</kwd><kwd>egalitarianism</kwd><kwd>right-wing authoritarianism</kwd><kwd>social dominance orientation</kwd><kwd>dangerous world belief</kwd><kwd>competitive-jungle world belief</kwd><kwd>zero-sum belief</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Alessiato, E. (2022). What is a worldview? Some suggestions from the history of the concept. Negotiation Journal, 38(3), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/nejo.12404. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ONJRLC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Andrews-Fearon, P., &amp; Götz, F. M. (2024). The zero-sum mindset. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 127(4), 758–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000404. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KLVFGD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Armaly, M. T., &amp; Enders, A. M. (2024). Who supports political violence? Perspectives on Politics, 22(2), 427–444. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592722001086</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Cheng, S.-L., Zhang, X., Zhao, C., Li, Y., Liu, S., &amp; Cheng, S. (2024). Worldview, psychological flexibility, and depression-anxiety-stress in Chinese youth. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1447183. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1447183. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JQHWQV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Chinoy, S., Nunn, N., Sequeira, S., &amp; Stantcheva, S. (2025). Zero-sum thinking and the roots of US political differences. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research, 53 p. https://doi.org/10.3386/w31688</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Chuang, F., Manley, E., &amp; Petersen, A. (2020). The role of worldviews in the governance of sustainable mobility. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(8), 4034–4042. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1916936117. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IKIVBH</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Crocker, J., Canevello, A., &amp; Lewis, K. A. (2017). Romantic relationships in the ecosystem: compassionate goals, nonzero-sum beliefs, and change in relationship quality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(1), 58–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000076</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>Dryhurst, S., Schneider, C. R., Kerr, J., Freeman, A. L. J., Recchia, G., … van der Linden, S. (2020). Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world. Journal of Risk Research, 23(7–8), 994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2020.1758193. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BBCDYS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Duckitt, J. (2001). A dual process cognitive-motivational theory of ideology and prejudice. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 41–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(01)80004-6</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Duckitt, J., Bizumic, B., Krauss, S. W., &amp; Heled, E. (2010). A tripartite approach to right-wing authoritarianism: the authoritarianism-conservatism-traditionalism model. Political Psychology, 31(5), 685–715. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00781.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Duckitt, J., Wagner, C., du Plessis, I., &amp; Birum, I. (2002). The psychological bases of ideology and prejudice: testing a dual process model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 75–93. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.75. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GXTUDD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Dunwoody, P. T., &amp; Funke, F. (2016). The aggression-submission-conventionalism scale: testing a new three-factor measure of authoritarianism. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(2), e4955. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i2.168</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Gaitho, N. (2022). Critical analysis of the prevailing worldviews and value systems in relation to how they are shaped by culture and identity. European Journal of Social Sciences Studies, 7(2), 10–30. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejsss.v7i2.1210. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZQZEDP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Gavrilets, S., &amp; Seabright, P. (2025). The evolution of zero-sum and positive-sum worldviews. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 122(32), e2504339122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2504339122. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/EERBZW</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Guo, Q., Muhetaer, P., &amp; Hu, P. (2023). Cultural worldviews and support for governmental management of COVID-19. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10, 879. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02339-w. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NFQTUL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., &amp; Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO7 scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Holmes, O. S., Findlay, B. M., &amp; Cook, R. (2021). Worldview psychology and the representation of spirituality, naturalism, and agnosticism: conceptualisation and psychometric measurement. Australian Journal of Psychology, 73(4), 535–547. https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2021.1918534. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NIJNGI</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Hsu, H.-Y., &amp; Wang, T. (2024). Opposite effects of RWA and SDO on war support: Chinese public opinion toward Russia’s war in Ukraine. British Journal of Social Psychology, 63(2), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12706. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/VCYSDN</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Hsu, H.-Y., Wang, T., &amp; Feng, X.-Y. (2025). Revisiting the “lethal union”: the role of RWA and SDO in the Chinese public’s reactions to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. International Journal of Psychology, 60(6), e70125. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.70125. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TKMCFU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Jost, J. T., Federico, C. M., &amp; Napier, J. L. (2009). Political ideology: its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163600</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B21"><label>21.</label><mixed-citation>Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., &amp; Mertz, C. K. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: explaining the white-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 465–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B22"><label>22.</label><mixed-citation>Kauff, M., Lämmle, L., Kroll, E., Gehring, L., Soucek, R., &amp; Asbrock, F. (2024). Should the city be for everyone? The relationship between worldviews, ideological attitudes, and the approval of hostile design. Journal of Community &amp; Applied Social Psychology, 34(4), e2867. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2867. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/RNDJYF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B23"><label>23.</label><mixed-citation>Kugler, M., Jost, J. T., &amp; Noorbaloochi, S. (2014). Another look at moral foundations theory: do authoritarianism and social dominance orientation explain liberal-conservative differences in “moral” intuitions? Social Justice Research, 27, 413–431. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11211-014-0223-5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HVHNGQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B24"><label>24.</label><mixed-citation>Lancaster, C., Alibrahim, M., Carter, C., Mumford, E., &amp; Sheridan-Johnson, J. (2025). Worldview and gun attitudes among American youth and young adults. Social Science Research, 129, 103180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103180. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NNYQOS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B25"><label>25.</label><mixed-citation>Lee, I.-C., Permyakova, T., &amp; Sheveleva, M. (2020). Reducing negative attitudes toward immigrants in Russia and Taiwan: possible beneficial effects of naïve dialecticism and an incremental worldview. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 572386. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.572386. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QIWISF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B26"><label>26.</label><mixed-citation>Liu, J. H., Zhang, R. J., Leung, A. K.-Y., Gil de Zúñiga, H., Gastardo-Conaco, C., Vasiutynskyi, V., &amp; Kus-Harbord, L. (2020). Empirical correlates of cosmopolitan orientation: etiology and functions in a worldwide representative sample. Political Psychology, 41, 661–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12644. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/TKWFHY</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B27"><label>27.</label><mixed-citation>Matsunaga, L. H., Petersen, J., Aoki, T., &amp; Faiad, C. (2024). The science of zero-sum thinking: a scoping review of 10 years of empirical research. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, 18(3), 209–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/17467586.2024.2441504</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B28"><label>28.</label><mixed-citation>McFarland, S., Hackett, J., Hamer, K., Katzarska-Miller, I., Malsch, A., Reese, G., &amp; Reysen, S. (2019). Global human identification and citizenship: a review of psychological studies. Political Psychology, 40, 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12572</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B29"><label>29.</label><mixed-citation>Nguyen, C. Q., &amp; Ames, D. R. (2025). Savvy or savage? How worldviews shape appraisals of antagonistic leaders. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 129(6), 1007–1036. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000456. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/IPBUGU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B30"><label>30.</label><mixed-citation>Nilsson, A., &amp; Jost, J. T. (2020). The authoritarian-conservatism nexus. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 148–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.03.003. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/KXVSMV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B31"><label>31.</label><mixed-citation>Nilsson, A., &amp; Teymoori, A. (2025). The dark side of ideology: ideological worldviews and antidemocratic attitudes. Annals of The New York Academy of Sciences, 1553(1), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.70062. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZCHZQK</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B32"><label>32.</label><mixed-citation>Olonisakin, T., Adebayo, S., &amp; Idemudia, E. (2021). Social worldviews and social attitudes: examining the psychological correlates for other-concern. Journal of Culture and Values in Education, 4(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.46303/jcve.2021.7. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/XIOZMV</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B33"><label>33.</label><mixed-citation>Perry, R., Sibley, C., &amp; Duckitt, J. (2013). Dangerous and competitive worldviews: a meta-analysis of their associations with social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2012.10.004</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B34"><label>34.</label><mixed-citation>Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L., &amp; Malle, B. (1994). Social dominance orientation: a personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.67.4.741. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HITRET</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B35"><label>35.</label><mixed-citation>Rippl, S. (2002). Cultural theory and risk perception: a proposal for a better measurement. Journal of Risk Research, 5(2), 147–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669870110042598</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B36"><label>36.</label><mixed-citation>Roberts, R., &amp; Davidai, S. (2022). The psychology of asymmetric zero-sum beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(3), 559–575. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000378. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/JXBBOU</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B37"><label>37.</label><mixed-citation>Roccato, M., &amp; Ricolfi, L. (2005). On the correlation between right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 27(3), 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2703_1</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B38"><label>38.</label><mixed-citation>Roczniewska, M., &amp; Wojciszke, B. (2021). Reducing hindering job demands: the role of belief in life as a zero-sum game and workload. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(19), 10036. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph181910036. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/ZAZZNQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B39"><label>39.</label><mixed-citation>Różycka-Tran, J., Alessandri, G., Jurek, P., &amp; Olech, M. (2018). A test of construct isomorphism of the belief in a zero-sum game scale: a multilevel 43-nation study. PLoS One, 13(9), e0203196. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203196. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/WUUJPC</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B40"><label>40.</label><mixed-citation>Różycka-Tran, J., Piotrowski, J. P., Żemojtel-Piotrowska, M., Jurek, P., Osin, E. N., … Maltby, J. (2021). Belief in a zero-sum game and subjective well-being across 35 countries. Current Psychology, 40(2), 3575–3584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00291-0. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BGCBGZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B41"><label>41.</label><mixed-citation>Seitova, D., Nariman, H. S., &amp; Kovacs, M. (2023). Cosmopolitanism and social dominance orientation mediate relationship between political orientation and sexism. Acta Psychologica, 240, 104037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2023.104037. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/NUTEWZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B42"><label>42.</label><mixed-citation>Šerek, J., &amp; Mužík, M. (2021). Who does not protect democracy? Examining the role of right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation. Personality and Individual Differences, 181, 111027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111027. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/HEIJLL</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B43"><label>43.</label><mixed-citation>Shiundu, T. W. (2024). A critical examination of dominant worldviews and value systems: exploring how culture and identity shape perspectives. Journal of Human Resource &amp; Leadership, 8(1), 78–86. https://doi.org/10.53819/81018102t30133. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AQORFE</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B44"><label>44.</label><mixed-citation>Siegrist, M., &amp; Bearth, A. (2021). Worldviews, trust, and risk perceptions shape public acceptance of COVID-19 public health measures. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(24), e2100411118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2100411118. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/PMXETD</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B45"><label>45.</label><mixed-citation>Takeda, M., Takagi, A., &amp; Toriyama, R. (2025). An attempt to construct a Japanese version of cultural worldviews scale. The Japanese Journal of Personality, 34(1), 34–36. https://doi.org/10.2132/personality.34.1.5. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/UXOWEP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B46"><label>46.</label><mixed-citation>Taylor, M., &amp; Pensini, P. (2025). Zero-sum beliefs about the human-nature relationship: the role of social dominance orientation, tolerance of ambiguity, and need for cognition. Psychology International, 7(4), 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/psycholint7040089. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/BJMMGP</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B47"><label>47.</label><mixed-citation>Tesi, A., &amp; Passini, S. (2025). Why don’t we care about others? A closer look at indifference through the lens of the dual process model and moral foundations theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 55(5), 359–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.13096. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/DPGFOF</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B48"><label>48.</label><mixed-citation>Vilanova, F., Almeida-Segundo, D. S., Milfont, T. L., &amp; Costa, A. B. (2025). Further testing a dual process social psychological model of corrupt intention and attitudes toward corrupt people. Current Psychology, 44, 8933–8947. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07822-y. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/GWNDQQ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B49"><label>49.</label><mixed-citation>Vilanova, F., Almeida-Segundo, D. S., Moura, P. B., Pratto, F., &amp; Costa, A. B. (2024). The limited impact of adverse experiences on worldviews and ideologies. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 2, 1375527. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1375527. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/SSMBZB</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B50"><label>50.</label><mixed-citation>Vilanova, F., Milfont, T. L., &amp; Costa, A. B. (2022). A dual process social psychological model of corrupt intention and attitudes toward corrupt people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 123(4), 854–883. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000414. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/AYQAQO</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B51"><label>51.</label><mixed-citation>Xue, W., Hine, D. W., Marks, A. D. G., Phillips, W. J., &amp; Zhao, S. (2016). Cultural worldviews and climate change: a view from China. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(2), Xue, W., Zeng, Z., Liu, Z., &amp; Marks, A. D. G. (2021). The role of cultural worldviews in predicting gambling risk perception and behavior in a Chinese sample. Brain and Behavior, 11(3), e02015. https://doi.org/10.1002/brb3.2015. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YIQYZS</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B52"><label>52.</label><mixed-citation>Zeigler-Hill, V. (2019). Fundamental social motives mediate the associations that dangerous and competitive social worldviews have with ideological attitudes. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 5, 29–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-018-0164-6. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/FEATNT</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B53"><label>53.</label><mixed-citation>Zeigler-Hill, V., &amp; Besser, A. (2022). Social worldviews and the likelihood of engaging in preemptive strikes. Personality and Individual Differences, 185, 111244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2021.111244. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/YQZJOW</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
