<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.2 20190208//EN" "https://jats.nlm.nih.gov/publishing/1.2/JATS-journalpublishing1.dtd">
<article xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.2" xml:lang="en"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">Russian Journal of Education and Psychology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="en">Russian Journal of Education and Psychology</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Russian Journal of Education and Psychology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn publication-format="print">2658-4034</issn><issn publication-format="electronic">2782-3563</issn><publisher><publisher-name xml:lang="en">Science and Innovation Center Publishing House</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">438073</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.12731/2658-4034-2026-17-2-1133</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="edn">EKPXQC</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>Personality in Psycho-Pedagogical Dimension</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="toc-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Личность в психолого-педагогическом измерении</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="article-type"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title xml:lang="en">Problems of teacher-student interaction in foreign language learning</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="ru"><trans-title>Проблемы взаимодействия преподавателя и студента в процессе изучения иностранного языка</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Nenyuk</surname><given-names>Evgenia A.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Ненюк</surname><given-names>Евгения Абрамовна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Россия</country></address><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Senior Lecturer of the Department of English Language and Professional Communication; Ph.D. in Linguistics</p> <p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>старший преподаватель кафедры английского языка и профессиональной коммуникации; Ph.D in Linguistics</p> <p> </p></bio><email>janna_tev@hotmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author"><name-alternatives><name xml:lang="en"><surname>Maleeva</surname><given-names>Ekaterina D.</given-names></name><name xml:lang="ru"><surname>Малеева</surname><given-names>Екатерина Дмитриевна</given-names></name></name-alternatives><address><country country="RU">Россия</country></address><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>руководитель образовательных программ; экономист-международник</p> <p> </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Head of Educational Programs; International Economist</p> <p> </p></bio><email>krotkovak@yandex.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3"/><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff4"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff1"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Финансовый университет при Правительстве Российской Федерации</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff id="aff2"><institution> New York University</institution></aff><aff-alternatives id="aff3"><aff><institution xml:lang="en">All-Russian Academy of Foreign Trade</institution></aff><aff><institution xml:lang="ru">Всероссийская академия внешней торговли</institution></aff></aff-alternatives><aff id="aff4"><institution> Diversity Ltd.</institution></aff><content-language>en</content-language><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2026-04-30" publication-format="electronic"><day>30</day><month>04</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><issue-title xml:lang="ru"/><fpage>444</fpage><lpage>465</lpage><history><date date-type="received" iso-8601-date="2026-07-17"><day>17</day><month>07</month><year>2026</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement xml:lang="en">Copyright ©; , Nenyuk E.A., Maleeva E.D.</copyright-statement><copyright-statement xml:lang="ru">Copyright ©; , Ненюк Е.А., Малеева Е.Д.</copyright-statement><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Nenyuk E.A., Maleeva E.D.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Ненюк Е.А., Малеева Е.Д.</copyright-holder><ali:free_to_read xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/"/><license><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/">https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0</ali:license_ref></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-4034/article/view/438073">https://journals.rcsi.science/2658-4034/article/view/438073</self-uri><abstract xml:lang="en"><p><bold>Background</bold><bold>. </bold>Studying the problems of teacher-student interaction in the process of learning a foreign language is believed to be quite significant since it is the nature of this interaction that largely determines not only the success of learning but also the student's attitude towards the language itself, culture, and the educational process as a whole. This is where pedagogy, psychology, linguistics, and cultural studies intersect, and any communication breakdowns may disrupt this complex structure. Unlike many other disciplines, language cannot be 'absorbed' passively. It is formed as well as developed in dialogue, in a communicative context. If the interaction between teacher and student is formal, asymmetric, or based on the fear of making mistakes, language ceases to be a means of communication and turns into a set of rules. Analyzing interaction problems helps to understand why students are afraid to speak, avoid spontaneous speech, and prefer silence to active participation. A common authoritarian model, in which the teacher dominates and the student only acts as a performer, often reduces communicative activity. Analyzing interaction problems allows us to identify, which teaching strategies truly promote the development of language competence and which merely create the illusion of learning.</p> <p><bold>Purpose. </bold>To analyze the problems of teacher-student interaction in the process of learning a foreign language, examine the influence of the classroom environment, define the roles of the student and the teacher, develop strategies for two-way positive communication between the teacher and the student, that fosters the ability to speak the foreign language.</p> <p><bold>Materials and methods. </bold>The study employed a combination of theoretical and empirical methods, including the analysis of scholarly literature, pedagogical observation, questionnaire surveys, interviews, and content and discourse analysis of classroom interaction. The research material consisted of audio and video recordings of foreign language classes, questionnaire data, interviews, teaching and learning materials, and the results of students’ progress.</p> <p><bold>Results. </bold>The authors conclude that teachers’ burnout leads to authoritarian approaches and lack of empathy, which in turn create more student’ resistance and emotional withdrawal. The educational system itself sometimes perpetuates emotional exhaustion and disengagement.</p> <p>The research results show that factors such as encouraging positive emotions, using structured but flexible curricula can significantly improve the quality of learning.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="ru"><p><bold>Обоснование. </bold>Изучение проблем взаимодействия преподавателя и студента в процессе изучения иностранного языка важно потому, что именно характер этого взаимодействия во многом определяет не только успешность обучения, но и отношение учащегося к самому языку, культуре и процессу образования в целом. Здесь сходятся педагогика, психология, лингвистика и культурология, и любые сбои в коммуникации разрушают эту сложную структуру. В отличие от многих других дисциплин, язык нельзя «усвоить» пассивно. Он формируется в диалоге, в ситуации общения. Если взаимодействие преподавателя и студента формально, асимметрично или основано на страхе ошибки, язык перестаёт быть средством общения и превращается в набор правил. Анализ проблем взаимодействия позволяет понять, почему студенты боятся говорить, избегают спонтанной речи и предпочитают молчание активному участию. Распространенная авторитарная модель, где преподаватель доминирует, а студент выступает лишь в роли исполнителя, часто снижает коммуникативную активность. Анализ проблем взаимодействия позволяет определить, какие стратегии преподавания действительно способствуют развитию речевой компетенции, а какие лишь создают иллюзию обучения.</p> <p><bold>Цель. </bold>Проанализировать проблемы взаимодействия преподавателя и студента в процессе изучения иностранного языка, показать влияние обстановки в классе, обозначить роли студента и преподавателя, выработать стратегии двусторонней позитивной коммуникации преподавателя и студента, ведущие к раскрытию способности заговорить на иностранном языке.</p> <p><bold>Материалы и методы. </bold>В исследовании использовался комплекс теоретических и эмпирических методов, включающий анализ научной литературы, педагогическое наблюдение, анкетирование, интервьюирование, контент- и дискурс-анализ учебного взаимодействия. Материалом исследования послужили аудио- и видеозаписи занятий по иностранному языку, анкетные данные, интервью, учебно-методические материалы и результаты успеваемости обучающихся.</p> <p><bold>Результаты. </bold>Авторы приходят к выводу, что эмоциональное выгорание преподавателя приводит к авторитарным подходам и отсутствию эмпатии, что, в свою очередь, усиливает сопротивление учащихся и их эмоциональную замкнутость. Сама система образования отчасти способствует эмоциональному истощению и отчуждению.</p> <p>Результаты исследования показывают, что такие факторы, как поощрение положительных эмоций, использование структурированных, но гибких учебных программ, могут значительно улучшить качество обучения.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>teacher-student interaction</kwd><kwd>foreign language</kwd><kwd>emotional and behavioral aspects</kwd><kwd>uniqueness of roles</kwd><kwd>supportive learning environment</kwd><kwd>compatibility</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>взаимодействие учителя и ученика</kwd><kwd>иностранный язык</kwd><kwd>эмоциональные и поведенческие аспекты</kwd><kwd>уникальность ролей</kwd><kwd>поддерживающая учебная среда</kwd><kwd>совместимость</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group/></article-meta></front><body></body><back><ref-list><ref id="B1"><label>1.</label><mixed-citation>Bieg, S., Nett, U. E. (2022). Teachers’ enthusiasm and humor and its lagged relationships with students’ enjoyment and boredom: a latent trait-state approach. Learning and Instruction, 81, 112–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101579</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B2"><label>2.</label><mixed-citation>Felder, R. M., Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and Learning STEM: A Practical Guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, pp. 107–109.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B3"><label>3.</label><mixed-citation>Fleming, N., Baume, D. (2006). Learning styles again: VARKing up the right tree. Educational Developments (SEDA, Ltd), 7(4), 4–7.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B4"><label>4.</label><mixed-citation>Frenzel, A. C., Becker-Kurz, B., Pekrun, R., Goetz, T. (2021). Teacher emotions in the classroom: a review. Educational Psychology Review, 33(1), 1–35.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B5"><label>5.</label><mixed-citation>Gunas, T., Simpen, I. W., Sudipa, I. N., Artawa, K. (2023). Politeness strategies in EFL teaching-learning context in high schools in Manggarai Region, Eastern Indonesia. The International Journal of Social Sciences World, 5(1), 211–221. URL: https://www.growingscholar.org/journal/index.php/TIJOSSW/article/view/317</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B6"><label>6.</label><mixed-citation>Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: teachers’ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(8), 811–826. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00028-7</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B7"><label>7.</label><mixed-citation>Kermanshahi, N., Pishghadam, R. (2022). Feedback and burnout in EFL teachers. International Journal of Language Testing, 1, 23–24.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B8"><label>8.</label><mixed-citation>King, J., Almukhaild, H., Mercer, S., Babic, S., Mairitsch, A., Sulis, G. (2024). Teacher emotions and the emotional labour of modern language (ML) teachers working in UK secondary schools. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 62(3), 1213–1235. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0080. EDN: https://elibrary.ru/QYGGEZ</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B9"><label>9.</label><mixed-citation>Koole, S., Dornan, T., Aper, L., Scherpbier, A., Valcke, M., Cohen-Schotanus, J., Derese, A. (2011). Reflective practice: a critique of the work of Argyris and Schön. BMC Medical Education, 104.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B10"><label>10.</label><mixed-citation>Lee, I. (2013). Research into practice: written corrective feedback. Language Teaching, 112–118.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B11"><label>11.</label><mixed-citation>Machost, D., et al. (2021). Reflective practices in education. CBE Life Sciences Education, 68–74.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B12"><label>12.</label><mixed-citation>Mahdi, S. (2023). Effective communication in learning: teacher strategies and their impact on student learning outcomes. International Journal of Linguistics, Communication, and Broadcasting, 1(4), 26–30.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B13"><label>13.</label><mixed-citation>Martinez, R., Wighting, M. (2023). Teacher-student relationships: impact of positive behavioral interventions and supports. Athens Journal of Education, 10(3), 397–410.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B14"><label>14.</label><mixed-citation>Nurmi, J.-E. (2012). Students’ characteristics and teacher-child relationships in instruction: a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 7(3), 177–197.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B15"><label>15.</label><mixed-citation>Nurmawati, Harianto, Atmowardoyo, et al. (2019). An analysis of positive politeness strategies to promote effective interaction in the classroom. ESL Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 171–178.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B16"><label>16.</label><mixed-citation>Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K., Allen, J. P. (2012). Teacher-student relationships and engagement: conceptualizing, measuring, and improving the capacity of classroom interactions. In: Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, pp. 365–386.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B17"><label>17.</label><mixed-citation>Richards, J. C. (2020). Exploring emotions in language teaching. RELC Journal, 11–15.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B18"><label>18.</label><mixed-citation>Tormey, R. (2021). Rethinking student-teacher relationships in higher education: a multidimensional approach. Springer Nature.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B19"><label>19.</label><mixed-citation>Wang, F. (2024). The relationship between students and teachers and its implications. Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Science, 390–395.</mixed-citation></ref><ref id="B20"><label>20.</label><mixed-citation>Wong, K., et al. (2017). The impact of teacher burnout on teaching quality. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89–96.</mixed-citation></ref></ref-list></back></article>
